Erving Goffman’s Systematic Sociology of Information
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2022/71.4/3Keywords:
Erving Goffman, Harold Garfinkel, information, sociological perspectives, sociology of information, systematicityAbstract
As part of Erving Goffman’s Centennial celebrations, this paper looks at his work pioneering the sociology of information. Goffman developed a theory of information sui generis, that was independent from extant studies of information. Goffman’s considerations of information suffuse his writings. These are systematic in that they develop and advance throughout his work. However, his contributions to the study of information are only just beginning to be recognized. Prevailing views of Goffman’s work have obscured appreciation of his systematic treatment of information. Goffman was pursuing information as a topic at the same time as Harold Garfinkel. Information – and the systematic study of information – are highlighted as criteria for establishing continuities and discontinuities between Goffman and Garfinkel.
References
Abrams Thomas. 2014. “Re-reading Erving Goffman as an emancipatory disability researcher”. Disability Studies Quarterly 34(1): https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/3434/3525.
Bar-Hillel Yehoshua, Rudolf Carnap. 1953. “Semantic information”. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4(14): 147–157.
Bateson Gregory. 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind. Toronto: Chandler.
Becker Howard S. 1960. “Notes on the concept of commitment”. American Journal of Sociology 66(1): 32–40.
Berger Peter L. 1963. Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bilmes Jack. 2009. “Taxonomies are for talking: A reanalysis of a Sacks classic”. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1600–1610.
Black Alistair, Dave Muddiman, Helen Plant. 2007. The early information society. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Brown Michael E. 2014. The concept of the social in uniting the humanities and the social sciences. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Button Graham. (ed.) 1991. Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carlin Andrew P. 2022a. Sociology of information: Falsification practices and the “Goffman Industry”. In: Exploring the interaction order: Studies on the works of Erving Goffman. Édison Gastaldo (ed.), in preparation.
Carlin Andrew P. 2022b. Goffman and Garfinkel: Sociologists of the ‘information order’. In: The Routledge international handbook of Goffman Studies. M.H. Jacobsen, G.W.H. Smith (eds.), 336–348. London: Routledge.
Carlin Andrew P., Younhee Kim. 2021. Longitudinal conversation analysis of parent–child interaction: Small data and interdisciplinary work in linguistics and sociology. In: SAGE Research Methods Cases. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529757248
Carlin Andrew P., Roger S. Slack, Ricardo Moutinho. 2022. Lay and professional inquiry: Multimodal analysis. In: The Routledge international handbook of ethnomethodology. A.P. Carlin, A. Dennis, K.N. Jenkings, O. Lindwall, M. Mair (eds.). London: Routledge. In preparation.
Cavan Sherri. 1966. Liquor license. Chicago: Aldine.
Cicourel Aaron V. 1972. Basic and normative rules in the negotiation of status and role. In: Studies in social interaction. D. Sudnow (ed.), 229–258. New York: Free Press.
Coleman James P. 1968. “Studies in ethnomethodology”. American Sociological Review 33(1): 122–130.
Collins O., Collins J.M. 1973. Interaction and social structure. The Hague: Mouton.
Coser Lewis A. 1975. “Two methods in search of a substance”. American Sociological Review 40(6): 691–700.
Coulter Jeff. 1995a. “Conceptual transformations”. Sociological Theory 13(2): 163–177.
Coulter Jeff. 1995b. “The informed neuron: Issues in the use of information theory in the behavioral sciences”. Mind and Machines 5: 583–596.
Cover Thomas M., Joy A. Thomas. 2006. Elements of information theory, 2nd Edition. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.
Crossley Nick. 1995. “Body techniques, agency and intercorporeality: On Goffman’s Relations in Public”. Sociology 29(1): 133–149.
Czyżewski Marek. 1989. “Garfinkel, «cognitive revolution», and conversation analysis”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1989(78): 43–56. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl.1989.78.43
Czyżewski Marek. 1994. “Reflexivity of actors versus reflexivity of accounts”. Theory, Culture & Society 11: 161–168.
Denzin Norman, Charles M. Keller. 1981. “Frame Analysis reconsidered”. Contemporary Sociology (10)1: 52–60.
Durkheim Emile. 1982. The rules of sociological method and selected texts on sociology and its method. London: Macmillan.
Garfinkel Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel Harold. 2008. Toward a sociological theory of information. Boulder: Paradigm.
Garfinkel Harold, Michael Lynch, Eric Livingston. 1981. “The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11(2): 131–158.
Garfinkel Harold, D. Lawrence Wieder. 1992. Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In: Text in context. G. Watson, R.M. Seiler (eds.), 175–206. Newbury Park: Sage.
Gastaldo Édison. 2002. Pátria, chuteiras e propaganda. Sao Paolo: Unisinos.
Gibson David R. 2014. “Enduring illusions: The social organization of secrecy and deception”. Sociological Theory 32(4): 283–306.
Giddens Anthony. 1988. Goffman as a systematic social theorist. In: Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order. P. Drew, A. Wootton (eds.), 201–279. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Giglietto Fabio, Laura Ianelli, Augusto Valeriani, Luca Rossi. 2019. “«Fake news» is the invention of a liar: How false information circulates within the hybrid news system”. Current Sociology Monograph 67(4): 625–642.
Giglioli Pier Paolo. 2022. “Erving Goffman’s first 100 years”. Special issue. Etnografia E Ricerca Qualitativa XV(1).
Glaser Barney G., Anselm L. Strauss. 1964. “Awareness contexts and social interaction”. American Sociological Review 29(5): 669–679.
Goffman Erving. 1952. Draft of Ph.D. Thesis statement. Bios Sociologicus: The Erving Goffman Archives, D.N. Shalin (ed.) UNLV: CDC Publications, 2007–2017.
Goffman Erving. 1953. Communication conduct in an island community. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
Goffman Erving. 1956. The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre.
Goffman Erving. 1957. “On some convergences of sociology and psychiatry”. Psychiatry 20(3): 199–203.
Goffman Erving. 1958. Characteristics of total institutions. Symposium on Preventive and Social Psychiatry. 43–84. Washington, DC: Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.
Goffman Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
Goffman Erving. 1961. Asylums. Garden City: Anchor.
Goffman Erving. 1963a. Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.
Goffman Erving. 1963b. Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Goffman Erving. 1969. Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goffman Erving. 1971. Relations in public. New York: Basic Books.
Goffman Erving. 1974. Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
Goffman Erving. 1979. Gender advertisements. New York: Harper and Row.
Goffman Erving. 1981a. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goffman Erving. 1981b. “A reply to Denzin and Keller”. Contemporary Sociology 10(1): 60–68.
Goffman Erving. 1983a. “The interaction order”. American Sociological Review 48(1): 1–17.
Goffman Erving. 1983b. “Felicity’s condition”. American Journal of Sociology 89(1): 1–53.
Goldthorpe John H. 1973. “A revolution in sociology?” Sociology 7(3): 449–462.
Gouldner Alvin W. 1970. The coming crisis of western sociology. London: Heinemann.
Hjørland Birger. 2011. “The importance of theories of knowledge: Browsing as an example”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(3): 594–603.
Hofkirchner Wolfgang. 2014. Epistemology and the study of social information within the perspective of a unified theory of information. In: Theories of information, communication and knowledge: A multidisciplinary approach. F. Ibekwe-SanJuan, T.M. Dousa (eds.), 51–69. Dordrecht: Springer.
Housley William, Rob Procter, Adam Edwards, Peter Burnap, Matthew Williams, Luke
Sloan, Omer Rana, Jeffrey Morgan, Alex Voss, Anita Greenhill. 2014. “Big and broad social data and the sociological imagination: A collaborative response”. Big Data & Society 1(2): 1–15.
Jaworski Gary D. 2021. “Goffman’s interest in spies and espionage: The University of Chicago context”. Symbolic Interaction 44(2): 392–411.
Jaworski Gary D. 2022. Strategic interaction. In: The Routledge international handbook of Goffman Studies. M.H. Jacobsen, G.W.H. Smith (eds.), 108–118. London: Routledge.
Kamio Akio. 1997. Territory of information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lash Scott. 2002. Critique of information. London: Sage.
Leib Robert S. 2017. “Spaces of the self: Foucault and Goffman on the micro-physics of discipline”. Philosophy Today 61(1): 189–210.
Louch A.R. 1966. Explanation and human action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lynch Michael, David Bogen. 1997. “Sociology’s asociological ‘core’: An examination of textbook sociology in light of the sociology of scientific knowledge”. American Sociological Review 62(3): 481–493.
Macbeth Doug. 2013. “Ethnomethodological explorations”. Schutzian Research 5: 137–149.
Machlup Fritz, Una Mansfield. 1983. The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages. New York: John Wiley.
Mair Michael, Christian Greiffenhagen, Wes W. Sharrock. 2016. “Statistical practice: Putting society on display”. Theory, Culture & Society 33(3): 51–77.
Mannheim Karl. 1966. Ideology and utopia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Manning Philip. 1992. Erving Goffman and modern sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
Marx Gary T. 2016. Windows into the soul: Surveillance and society in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marx Gary T., Glenn W. Muschert. 2009. Simmel on secrecy: A legacy and inheritance for the sociology of information. In: Soziologie als Möglichkeit: 100 Jahre Georg Simmel’s Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. C. Rol, C. Papilloud (eds.), 217–233. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenshcaften.
Maseda Ramón Vargas. 2017. Deciphering Goffman. London: Routledge.
McHoul Alec W. 2015. The humdrum. In: The Routledge companion to global popular culture. T. Miller (ed.), 112–118. New York: Routledge.
Meier Richard L. 1965. Information input overload: Features of growth in communications-oriented institutions. In: Mathematical explorations in behavioral science. F. Massarik, P. Ratoosh (eds.), 233–273. Homewood: R.D. Irwin Inc and The Dorsey Press.
Merleau-Ponty Maurice. 1962. The phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Merleau-Ponty Maurice. 1963. The structure of behaviour. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Murphy Alexandra K., Colin Jerolmack, DeAnna Smith. 2021. “Ethnography, data transparency and the information age”. Annual Review of Sociology. 47: 41–61.
Neumann John von, Oskar Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Parsons Talcott. 1937. The structure of social action. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
Parsons Talcott. 1951. The social system. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
Pollner Melvin. 1991. “Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity”. American Sociological Review 56(3): 370–380.
Ramage Magnus, David Chapman. 2011. Perspectives on information. New York: Routledge.
Rawls Anne Warfield. 2013. “The early years, 1939–1953: Garfinkel at North Carolina, Harvard and Princeton”. Journal of Classical Sociology 13(2): 303–312.
Rawls Anne Warfield, Kevin Whitehead, Waverley Duck. 2020. Introduction. In: Black Lives Matter: Ethnomethodological and conversation analytic studies of race and systemic racism in everyday interaction. 4–38. London: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/go/black-lives-matter-an-ethnomethodology-freebook.
Ritchie David. 1986. “Shannon and Weaver: Unravelling the paradox of information”. Communication Research 13(2): 278–298.
Robinson Lyn, David Bawden. 2014. Mind the gap: Transitions between concepts of information in varied domains. In: Theories of information, communication and knowledge: A multidisciplinary approach. F. Ibekwe-SanJuan, T.M. Dousa (eds.), 121–141. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rose Edward. 1960. The English record of a natural sociology. American Sociological Review 25(2): 193–208.
Ruesch Jurgen, Gregory Bateson. 1951. Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: W.W. Norton.
Ryle Gilbert. 1966. The concept of mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Sacks Harvey. 1972. Notes on police assessment of moral character. In: Studies in social interaction. David Sudnow (ed.), 280–293. New York: Free Press.
Sassen Saskia. 2002. “Towards a sociology of information technology”. Current Sociology 50(3): 365–388.
Saussure Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de Linguistic Générale. Lausanne: Payot.
Schegloff Emanuel A. 1988. Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In: Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order. P. Drew, A. Wootton (eds.), 89–135. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Scott John. 2022. Goffman and Giddens: Discovering a systematic theorist. In: The Routledge international handbook of Goffman Studies. M.H. Jacobsen, G. Smith (eds.), 361–371. Abingdon: Routledge.
Shannon Claude E., Warren Weaver. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Simmel Georg. 1906. “The sociology of secrecy and of secret societies”. American Journal of Sociology 11(4): 441–498.
Smith Gregory W.H. 1989. “Snapshots sub specie aeternitatis: Simmel, Goffman and formal sociology”. Human Studies 12(1): 19–57.
Smith Gregory W.H. 1999. Goffman and social organisation. London: Routledge.
Smith Gregory W.H. 2003. Ethnomethodological readings of Goffman. In: Goffman’s legacy. A. Javier Treviño (ed.), 254–283. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Smith Gregory W.H. 2006. Erving Goffman. Abingdon: Routledge.
Smith Greg. 2011. Erving Goffman. In: The Wiley-Blackwell companion to major social theorists. G. Ritzer, J. Stepinsky (eds.), 125–154. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Smith Gregory W.H. 2022. William Lloyd Warner (1898–1970). In: Goffman-Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung. R. Hettlage, K. Lenz (eds.). 123–129. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler Verlag.
Smith Robin J. 2022. Interaction in public places. In: The Routledge international handbook of Goffman Studies. M.H. Jacobsen, G. Smith (eds.), 97–107. Abingdon: Routledge.
Strong Philip M. 1979a. “Sociological imperialism and the profession of medicine”. Social Science and Medicine 13A: 199–215.
Strong Philip M. 1979b. The ceremonial order of the clinic. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Sudnow David. 1967. Passing on. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Verhoeven Jef C. 1993. “An interview with Erving Goffman, 1980”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(3): 317–348.
Watson Rod. 1992. The understanding of everyday life: Is there a common ground? In: Text in context. G.Watson, R.M. Seiler (eds.), 1–19. Newbury Park: Sage.
Watson Rod. 2009. Analysing practical and professional texts. Abingdon: Routledge.
Watson Rod. 2021. “Quem ‘matou’ Erving Goffman?”. Veredas: Journal of Linguistic Studies 25(1): 12–42.
Watson Rod, Andrew P. Carlin. 2012. “«Information»: Praxeological considerations”. Human Studies 35(2): 327–345.
Wieder D. Lawrence, Don H. Zimmerman, Geoffrey Raymond. 2010. UCLA: Then and now. In: The social history of language and social interaction. W. Leeds-Hurwitz (ed.), 127–158. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Wiley Norbert. 2019. “Interview with Harold Garfinkel”. Human Studies 42(2): 165–181.
Williams Robin. 1988. Understanding Goffman’s methods. In: Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order. P. Drew, A. Wootton (eds.), 64–88. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Winch Peter. 1974. Understanding a primitive society. In: Rationality. B.R. Wilson (ed.), 78–111. Oxford: Blackwell.
Winkin Yves. 2022. D’Erving à Goffman: L’Oeuvre Performée. Paris: MkF Éditions.
Wolff Kurt H. 1950. The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.
Zimmerman Don H. 1987. “Studies in ethnomethodology: Twenty years later”. D.A.R.G. Newsletter 3(2): 20–25.
