Sharing for free and for profit: the case of social media users in Poland

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2022/71.3/8

Keywords:

sharing, social media, social capital, resource generator

Abstract

Sharing is a social practice that is undergoing multidimensional transformation stimulated by increasing human activity in social media. With the development of new forms of communication, the meanings, senses, schemas, values, rules, actors, and resources being shared are changing. The shape of sharing is influenced by social relations leading to material and non-material resources (social capital). The purpose of this paper is to analyze factors (social capital, consumption and environmental attitudes) that may influence the two forms of sharing: (i) for free, and (ii) for profit. The results of the this study (CAWI, N 1508) suggest that “embedded resources” have a positive effect on the two forms of sharing analyzed, while “mobilizable resources” have a negative effect on sharing for profit. Sharing for profit is stimulated by consumerism, while pro-environmental attitudes have a positive effect on sharing for free.

References

Batorski Dominik, Michał Bojanowski, Kamil Filipek. 2015. “Getting a job: Resources and individual’s chances on the Warsaw labour market”. Polish Sociological Review 192(4): 475–492.

Belk Russell. 2007. “Why not share rather than own?”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 611(May): 126–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/25097913.

Benenson Joyce F., Evelyne Gauthier, Henry Markovits. 2021. “Girls exhibit greater empathy than boys following a minor accident”. Scientific Reports 11(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87214-x.

Botsman Rachel, Roo Rogers. 2010. What’s mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Business.

Bucher Eliane, Christian Fieseler, Christoph Lutz. 2016. “What’s mine is yours (for a nominal dee) – Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing”. Computers in Human Behavior 62: 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.002.

Buczynski Beth. 2013. Sharing is good: how to save money, time and resources through collaborative consumption. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

Burt Ronald S. 2004. “Structural holes and good ideas”. American Journal of Sociology 110(2): 349–399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/421787.

Cai Yang, Youming Song, Xia Xiao, Wendian Shi. 2020. “The effect of social capital on tacit knowledge-sharing intention: the mediating role of employee vigor”. SAGE Open 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020945722.

Castells Manuel. 2009. Communication power. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Couldry Nick. 2004. “Theorising media as practice”. Social Semiotics 14(2): 115–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1035033042000238295.

van Dijck José. 2013. The culture of connectivity. A critical history of social media. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

van Dijck José. 2015. “After connectivity: The era of connectication”. Social Media + Society 1(1–2): https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115578873.

Evans Laurel, Gregory R. Maio, Adam Corner, Carl J. Hodgetts, Sameera Ahmed, Ulrike Hahn. 2013. “Self-interest and pro-environmental behaviour”. Nature Climate Change 3(2): 122–125. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1662.

Filipek Kamil. 2020. “The meanings of sharing: On Facebook sharing strategies among Polish migrants in Germany and the UK”. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research 45(2): 176–197. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-2031.

Filipek Kamil, Andrzej Cwynar, Wiktor Cwynar. 2019. “Does social capital influence debt literacy? The case of Facebook users in Poland”. Prague Economic Papers 28(5): 567–588. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.721.

Flap Henk, Beate Völker. 2001. “Goal specific social capital and job satisfaction: Effects of different types of networks on instrumental and social aspects of work”. Social Networks 23(4): 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00044-2.

Fuchs Christian. 2015. Culture and economy in the age of social media. New York: Routledge.

van der Gaag Martin. 2005. Measurement of individual social capital. Amsterdam: F&N Boekservices.

van der Gaag Martin, Tom A.B. Snijders. 2005. “The resource generator: Social capital quantification with concrete items”. Social Networks 27(1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.10.001.

Granovetter Mark S. 1973. “The strength of weak ties”. The American Journal of Sociology (6): 1360–1380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/225469.

Granovetter Mark S. 1974. Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Grewal Daisy. 2012. “How wealth reduces compassion”. Scientific American April: 12–13.

Humphreys Ashlee. 2016. Social media. Enduring principle. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

John Nicholas A. 2013. “Sharing and web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword”. New Media and Society 15(2): 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812450684.

John Nicholas A. 2017. The age of sharing. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.

Karpova Elena E., Iva Jestratijevic, JuYoung Lee, Juanjuan Wu. 2022. “An ethnographic study of collaborative fashion consumption: The case of temporary clothing swapping”. Sustainability 14(5): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052499.

Kramer Bryan J. 2015. Shareology: How sharing powers the human economy. New York: Morgan James Publishing.

Lin Nan. 2001. Social capital. A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, Malden: Cambridge University Press.

Lin Nan, Karen Cook, Ronald S. Burt (eds.) 2001. Social capital. Theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Lin Nan, Mary Dumin. 1986. “Access to occupations through social ties”. Social Networks 8(4): 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(86)90003-1.

Lindenberg Siegwart. 1996. Continuities in the theory of social production functions. In: Verklarende sociologie, H. Ganzeboom, S. Lindenberg (eds.), 169–184. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.

Majchrzak Ann, Samer Faraj, Gerald C. Kane, Bijan Azad. 2013. “The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(1): 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12030.

Marjański Andrzej, Łukasz Sułkowski. 2019. “The evolution of family entrepreneurship in Poland: Main findings based on surveys and interviews from 2009–2018”. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review 7(1): 95–116. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070106.

Marody Mirosława. 2014. Jednostka po nowoczesności. Perspektywa socjologiczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Maslow Abraham. 2014. Motywacja i osobowość. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Mauss, Marcel. 1973. Szkic o darze. Forma i postawa wymiany w społeczeństwach archaicznych. W: M. Mauss, Socjologia i antropologia, przeł. M. Król, K. Pomian, J. Szacki, 107–168. Warszawa: PWN.

McPherson Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, James M. Cook. 2001. “Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks”. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.

Meikle Graham. 2016. Social media. Communication, sharing and visibility. London and New York: Routledge.

Mokken Rob J. 1971. A theory and procedure of scale analysis: With application in political research. Mouton, The Hague, Paris: Mouton & Co.

Niesiobędzka, Małgorzata, Karol Konaszewski. 2022. “Narcissism, activity on Facebook, and conspicuous consumption among young adults”. Current Issues in Personality Psychology 10(1): 21–31. https://doi.org/10.5114/CIPP.2021.108751.

Ormel Johan, Siegwart Lindenberg, Nardi Steverink, Michael Vonkorff. 1997. “Quality of life and social production functions: A framework for understanding health effects”. Social Science & Medicine 45(7): 1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00032-4.

Pentland Alex. 2015. Social physics: How social networks can make us smarter. London: Penguin Books.

Rainie Lee, Barry Wellman. 2012. Networked. The new social operating system. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: MIT Press.

Styła Rafał. 2009. „Kwestionariusz do pomiaru indywidualnego kapitału społecznego (KPIKS) – wstępna propozycja oparta na idei generatora zasobów Toma Snijdersa”. Psychologia Społeczna 4, 1–2(10): 67–77.

Swidler Ann. 2001. What anchors cultural practices. In: The practice turn in contemporary theory, T.R. Schatzki, K.K. Cetina, E. von Savigny (eds.), 83–101. London and New York: Routledge

Wasko McLure M., S. Faraj. 2005. “Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice”. MIS Quarterly 29(1): 35–57. http://doi.org/10.2307/25148667.

Zuboff Shoshana. 2020. Wiek kapitalizmu inwigilacji. Walka o przyszłość ludzkości na nowej granicy władzy. Warszawa: Zysk i S-ka.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-25

How to Cite

Filipek, K. (2022). Sharing for free and for profit: the case of social media users in Poland. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 71(3), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2022/71.3/8

Issue

Section

ARTICLES